Close Menu
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Subscribe
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Home»Cover Story»High Court declares 2.75% SHIF deduction illegal
Cover Story

High Court declares 2.75% SHIF deduction illegal

Samuel NjihiaBy Samuel NjihiaJune 23, 2025Updated:June 23, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
Justice Chacha Mwita
Justice Chacha Mwita. (Photo: Courtesy)
Share
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram

The High Court has declared the mandatory 2.75 per cent deduction from gross income for the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF) illegal, dealing a significant blow to the government’s efforts to finance Universal Health Coverage (UHC).

In a ruling delivered on Monday, Justice Chacha Mwita found that the levy amounts to double taxation, stating that it imposes an additional charge on income that has already been taxed under the Income Tax Act.

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

“The law is clear that gross income is chargeable to income tax. Subjecting it to any other statutory deduction, particularly of a similar nature, is unlawful,” said Justice Mwita in his judgement.

  • SHIF should ease financial strain for families with terminally ill patients

The decision throws into question the future of SHIF, the government’s flagship health financing scheme intended to replace the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) and broaden access to healthcare. It also raises concerns over how the state will fund the ambitious UHC agenda in the wake of the ruling.

The case was filed by four medical doctors who challenged not only the legality of the deductions but also the manner in which personal data was being handled during the transition from NHIF to SHIF.

They argued that individuals were not given an opportunity to consent to the transfer of their information between the systems.

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

Email your news TIPS to Editor@nairobilawmonthly.com, and to advertise with us, call +254715061658 anytime of the day
SHA SHIF
Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter) Follow on WhatsApp
Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
Samuel Njihia

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

Related Posts

Ruto hits back at critics, vows to deliver amid political heat

July 16, 2025

Eight in the dock over Mawego Police Station arson attack

July 16, 2025

Principals sound alarm over Sh36bn delayed capitation

July 15, 2025

Family sues IG Kanja over missing Wajir officer

July 15, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Download Latest Edition
Latest Posts
Sports

Aldrine Kibet set to join Celta Vigo in Sh900 million deal

By Special CorrespondentJuly 17, 2025
Briefing

Ruto hits back at critics, vows to deliver amid political heat

By Davin MuthoniJuly 16, 2025
Briefing

Eight in the dock over Mawego Police Station arson attack

By Special CorrespondentJuly 16, 2025
Opinion

Why Knut should rethink its call for teachers to strike

By Mbugua Ng’ang’aJuly 15, 2025
Business

Principals sound alarm over Sh36bn delayed capitation

By Wambui WachiraJuly 15, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About Us
  • Member Content
  • Download Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy policy
© 2025 NairobiLawMonthly. Designed by Okii.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.