‘Creation of additional Chief Administrative Secretary posts did not adhere to the democratic principle of public participation’
In the second high-profile case in as many weeks, the High Court has declared the appointment of Chief Administrative Secretaries (CASs) unconstitutional.
Justice Hedwig Ong’udi’s decisions is pegged on the lack of public participation in the appointment process of 27 additional CAS posts, highlighting a failure on the part of the Public Service Commission (PSC) to fulfill its mandate.
The absence of public involvement, Justice Ong’udi ruled, signals a violation of constitutional principles. Public participation is a fundamental aspect of democratic governance, ensuring transparency, accountability, and inclusivity.
”Was there public participation in regard to the appointment of the 27 extra CASs? There was no public participation in the appointment of the extra 27 CASs. The establishment of the extra 27 CAS positions is unconstitutional,” Justice Ongudi said.
The High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of parliamentary approval for the nominees, noting that it raised concerns regarding the role of the CASs, referring to them as “assistant cabinet ministers.”
The court emphasized the substantial wage bill associated with the CAS office, subtly raising concerns about the burden it places on the public.
We will bring you additional analysis of this story in due course.
Email your news TIPS to Editor@nairobilawmonthly.com, and to advertise with us, call +254715061658 anytime of the day
