Close Menu
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Subscribe
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Home»Archives»Facets of judicial anomalies in gender-based violence
Archives

Facets of judicial anomalies in gender-based violence

NLM CorrespondentBy NLM CorrespondentFebruary 2, 2016Updated:March 22, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
Share
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram

Lanji Ouko

Article 10 of the Constitution, under clause (3) stipulates that “All state organs and all public officers have the duty to address the needs of vulnerable groups within society, including women, older members of society, persons with disabilities, children, youth, members of minority or marginalised communities, and members of particular ethnic, and religious communities.”

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

In attempts to gauge individual and institutional responses to gender-based violence, a number of studies have focused on the action of reporting by the victim, the services the victim receives, the role of the health staff and the institutions the victim reported to, and actions taken by those reported to. Each study highlights a number of obstacles overcome by the legal enforcement institutions.

Despite these institutions’ attempts to address the challenges of gender-based violence, through a wide spectrum of policies and laws, its magnitude continues to reach alarming heights. The institutions involved need to change, not only the way in which gender-based violence is perceived and understood, but also in the manner in which the institutions such as the security and judicial systems respond to reported cases.

The various debates centred on the principle of due diligence by the institutions later raised the question on the role of judges in ensuring violence against women is reduced if not eliminated.

In July 1993, the Kenyan Women Judges Association was founded and registered under the Societies Act. The association is a non-profit, non-partisan and non-governmental organisation. The KWJA ideals and vision for existence are anchored on the values of gender equity and equality, social justice and fair representation, to be attained by creating an enabling environment for accessing the courts and responsive justice for all, through skills and knowledge enhancement for judicial officers on human rights and gender.

Hotbed of untapped potential

With all due respect, the women judges association is sitting on its own hotbed of untapped potential. The judges may use their role to contribute in the creation of policy and abolish impediments to justice, such as the requirement that evidence of violence against women be corroborated. An example is the establishment of policies based on human rights issues to solve other impediments to justice, for instance, thepolice reforms, specifically in regard to sensitivity and privacy during the investigation and prosecution of cases of this nature.

Additionally, an officer may overlook the requirement to accurately record the case and preserves the evidence. Poorly collected evidence, and poorly recorded cases, leads to a number of impediments to accessing justice in cases of violence. Other barriers, which may be solved through policy-making, include delays in court procedures, hours of operation and locations of courts, as well as difficulty in acquiring certification from medical doctors.

The creation of awareness through campaigns and open days, involving both men and women of the community, would go a long way in eroding the cultural practises of female subordination. Likewise, education and training of specialised groups in order to uphold integrity, respect of human right and fundamental freedoms would be another mitigating factor. Judicial officers need to be sensitised on the provision of the law and implementation of the reparation of victims. The reparation may be in form of monetary compensation and free treatment in government hospitals, counselling and any required after care. The current judicial system puts emphasis solely on the punishment of the offender; however by utilizing provisions of law such reparation, it would serve as a mechanism to deter offenders.

Every other day, resources are allocated for sexual and gender-based violence programmes, but which is of no use if the institutions lack the precise tools required to drive the agenda. These institutions require more than just resources, knowledge, analysis and information. The institutions require to be self-driven in order to maintain the initial momentum gained at the beginning. Implementation speaks louder than any number of workshops and conferences.

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

Email your news TIPS to Editor@nairobilawmonthly.com, and to advertise with us, call +254715061658 anytime of the day
Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter) Follow on WhatsApp
Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
NLM Correspondent

📢 Got a Story That Needs Coverage? Let Nairobi Law Monthly be your platform! Whether it's breaking news or an in-depth feature, we're here to amplify your voice. 📧 Email Us: editor@nairobilawmonthly.com ✨ Advertising Opportunities Available! Promote your brand to our engaged audience. Contact us today to discuss advertising options. 📞 Call Anytime: +254715061658 Don't miss out on the chance to reach a wider audience and make an impact. Get in touch with Nairobi Law Monthly now!

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

Related Posts

Distributed ledger tech: introducing hedera to the law

January 2, 2025

Technology investments for law firms in a post-COVID world

December 20, 2024

A moral inventory of oneself is king in recovering from alcoholism

May 1, 2023

New Safaricom CEO Dangerous for Workers’ Rights – COTU

February 28, 2023
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Download Latest Edition
Latest Posts
Briefing

Court sends Sh2bn Ketraco–China Power case to arbitration

By Nusurah NuhuJuly 18, 2025
Briefing

Suspect arrested in throat-slashing murder at Kenyatta Hospital

By Special CorrespondentJuly 18, 2025
Briefing

Naivasha MP Jayne Kihara in court after overnight detention by police

By Wambui WachiraJuly 18, 2025
Life

Veteran politician Phoebe Asiyo dies at 93 after stroke in US

By Davin MuthoniJuly 18, 2025
Sports

Aldrine Kibet set to join Celta Vigo in Sh900 million deal

By Special CorrespondentJuly 17, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About Us
  • Member Content
  • Download Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy policy
© 2025 NairobiLawMonthly. Designed by Okii.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.