Close Menu
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Subscribe
  • Briefing
    • Review
  • Business
  • Essays & Editorial
    • Special Reports
  • Case Law
  • Life
  • Member Content
    • All Products
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
Nairobi Law MonthlyNairobi Law Monthly
Home»Archives»TI OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR GRAFT
Archives

TI OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR GRAFT

NLM writerBy NLM writerJuly 21, 2014Updated:March 22, 2023No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
Share
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

TI opposes death penalty for graft

Transparency International (TI) Kenya has opposed a move by Kiharu MP Irungu Kang’ata to amend Section 48 of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act to impose the death penalty on those guilty of corruption.

 

TI Executive Director Samuel Kimeu found the lawmaker’s move “misdirected and diversionary”.

“Our position is informed by two reasons. First, the imposition of the death penalty for any offence has been a divisive issue in Kenya. Even though the death penalty is still in our statute books, there is very strong sentiment against it. There exists an effective moratorium on executions that tilts the balance in favour of those against the death penalty in Kenya.

“Secondly, the debate on the death penalty unnecessarily diverts attention from the important work of strengthening our justice system to ensure there are no gaps that the corrupt use to escape justice. So far, the frustration of many Kenyans is that there are very few people who are being held to account successfully through the legal system.”

Kimeu said the effectiveness of any legal system was founded not on the extremity of the sanctions thereof, but on the consistency of enforcement. “There is very little utility in allowing for extreme sanctions even if the seemingly lenient ones are hardly delivered. The sanctions for corruption in our statute books if stringently enforced, coupled with upholding the principle of equality before the law are sufficient in helping Kenya succeed in fighting corruption.”

The Nairobi Law Monthly September Edition

Email your news TIPS to Editor@nairobilawmonthly.com, and to advertise with us, call +254715061658 anytime of the day
Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter) Follow on WhatsApp
Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram
NLM writer

Related Posts

Distributed ledger tech: introducing hedera to the law

January 2, 2025

Technology investments for law firms in a post-COVID world

December 20, 2024

A moral inventory of oneself is king in recovering from alcoholism

May 1, 2023

New Safaricom CEO Dangerous for Workers’ Rights – COTU

February 28, 2023
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Download Latest Edition
Latest Posts
Briefing

DP Kindiki clears the air over altercation with CS Ruku

By Special CorrespondentMay 12, 2025
Briefing

Kenya Kwanza MPs back President Ruto’s IEBC nominations

By Davin MuthoniMay 12, 2025
Briefing

Suspected hitman in Kasipul MP Were’s murder arrested

By Special CorrespondentMay 12, 2025
Briefing

23 TV stations face shutdown over illegal betting ads

By Davin MuthoniMay 12, 2025
Briefing

Mexico sues Google over ‘Gulf of America’ name change

By Special CorrespondentMay 10, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About Us
  • Member Content
  • Download Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy policy
© 2025 NairobiLawMonthly. Designed by Okii.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.